Laconics Round Table

Laconics Round Table
 
HomeFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
wag
Cervelle de Veau
avatar

Posts : 8386
Join date : 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:25 pm

Senate GOP responds:  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/16/mitch-mcconnell-merrick-garland-biden-rule/



Snips below from multiple sources:

Judge Garland insisted on being sent to the scene even as bodies were being pulled out of the wreckage, said Jamie S. Gorelick, then the deputy attorney general.

“At the time, he said to me the equivalent of ‘Send me in, coach,’” Ms. Gorelick said. “He worked around the clock, and he was flawless.”

President Obama said Garland was a man who plays everything by the book. During the investigation of the Oklahoma City bombing, Garland refused voluntary evidence and instead sought subpoenas for the evidence.


_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
wag
Cervelle de Veau
avatar

Posts : 8386
Join date : 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:26 pm

I think this is just a litmus test, for jews to see who they are up against.  Here's a guy that provided solid cover for the OKC bombing op, which many in power probably understand better than we do.  Trump must also know, must also know about 9-11.  Jews are baiting with this move.  They want to know who would question their guy on how OKC was managed, which would also indicate a certain boldness to question 9-11.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
amalgamy
Porkchop


Posts : 290
Join date : 2014-04-16

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:01 pm


Tridentine Judaism and the New Supreme Court Nominee

By Michael Hoffman
www.revisionisthistory.org

When we examine the curriculum vitae of Merrick Garland, Mr. Obama’s nominee to replaced the late Justice Antonin Scalia, we find that as a federal prosecutor he helped to mastermind the criminal conspiracy that covered up the ultimate perpetrators of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. Until Bill Jasper’s investigative reports for the John Birch Society are gathered into a book, the best volume on that conspiracy is The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror, a work banned by the US government and forced out of print, though copies are still available on the used book market.

Flanked by President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, Garland told reporters in the Rose Garden, “My grandparents left the Pale of Settlement…in the early 1900’s, fleeing anti-Semitism and hoping to make a better life for their children in America,”

Mr. Garland was raised in a Talmudic community in Chicago by Judaic parents. His mother, Shirley (Horowitz), worked as director of services at Chicago’s “Council for Jewish Elderly.” His father, Cyril Garland, an advertising executive, is deceased. Garland’s wife, Lynn Rosenman, is Judaic royalty. She is the grand-daughter of the late Russian-American attorney and political king-maker, Samuel I. Rosenman, who served in the White House as Special Counsel to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, after promoting FDR’s early political career in New York.

Victims of the Hegelian dialectic will lament the loss of their “thesis,” Mr. Scalia, and consider the “antithesis,” Garland, a poor substitute. We doubt that Mr. Scalia would have taken so dim a view of Judge Garland, however.

Justice Scalia was a leader in the movement we call Tridentine Judaism. It is a Hegelian synthesis of some adherents of the Tridentine Latin Mass movement inside the Catholic Church, and adherents of Talmudic Judaism inside the synagogue. In a recent Hoffman Wire we informed readers about this network and Mr. Scalia’s role in promoting Talmudic halacha (law) in the American courts. Next week our Revisionist History newsletter no. 83 will be mailed to subscribers. It will contain an extended study of this ominous phenomenon, accompanied by illustrations of rare documents and photos.

Further evidence of the infernal synthesis has materialized online. In February, two renowned Catholic organizations within the Tridentine movement, the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, and International Una Voce, issued “Position Paper 28” on the Internet, titled: The Good Friday Prayer for the Jews in the Extraordinary Form. It’s online here.

Read the scurrilous section entitled, “The Fathers and the Middle Ages.” It could have been written by an Orthodox rabbi. It goes so far as to allege that the Fathers of the Early Church were somehow in favor of rabbinic Judaism!

In an effort to ask for an amendment of the document, which libels the saintly Nicholas of Donin, the 13th century Judaic convert to Catholicism who has the distinction of having prosecuted the Talmud at the first trial of the rabbinic book in the history of Christendom, we corresponded with the “Catholic” author of The Good Friday Prayer position paper. He is a tutor at St. Benet’s Hall at Oxford University, yet we might as well have been corresponding with one of Judge Scalia’s beloved Chabad rabbis, so thick was this person’s pilpul. In his e-mail to this writer he favorably compared the Babylonian Talmud to the Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas.

When we attempted to correct some of the more egregious statements in his position paper, which is being circulated throughout the “traditional” and “conservative” Catholic world, he would not engage with our research and resorted to an appeal to consensus reality, telling us, “The paper relies on the scholarship referred to in the footnotes. This is current and respectable; we don't expect everyone to agree, but we do expect reasonable people to accept that the position the paper takes is itself reasonable.”

The main corpus of the “scholarship referred to in the footnotes” is based on an absurd apologia for Talmudic Judaism which can be resoundingly refuted if any “traditional Catholics” with the necessary resources were interested in commissioning such a refutation.

Justice Scalia lent his prestige to this type of unnatural union between ghastly rabbinic homonculi and the Catholic Church. It is a movement that is growing by leaps and bounds. But instead of censuring it, Catholics are going after us for “denigrating” the “heroic” Mr. Scalia.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
wag
Cervelle de Veau
avatar

Posts : 8386
Join date : 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Thu Mar 17, 2016 4:43 pm

This is a very bold, but futile move for the jews, as there's really no chance the Senate takes this up.  The issue won't help Clinton either.  If not bait, maybe they use it as a vehicle for sending messages.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Vidarr
Filet Mignon
avatar

Posts : 2169
Join date : 2013-01-23
Location : Iran

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:12 am

wag wrote:
Trump must also know, must also know about 9-11.

Trump sure knows somethings off.. He has stated in interviews he´s eager to find out and reveal the censored information in intelligence reports about the real perpetrators. Though he hints at Saudi Arabia, i would still be surprised if he´s willing to reveal any Israeli link.

If he´s serious about that he won´t make it to the elections.

The media is already warming the people up to the plausibility and justification of a deadly attack.




_________________
-"Vidarr was easily the biggest a-hole posting here.".... "by far".
Back to top Go down
View user profile
wag
Cervelle de Veau
avatar

Posts : 8386
Join date : 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:50 pm

Vidarr wrote:
wag wrote:
Trump must also know, must also know about 9-11.

Trump sure knows somethings off.. He has stated in interviews he´s eager to find out and reveal the censored information in intelligence reports about the real perpetrators. Though he hints at Saudi Arabia, i would still be surprised if he´s willing to reveal any Israeli link.

Being a real estate guy, Trump certainly checked out the WTCs when they were being sold just before 9-11.  Obviously he passed up on them, and Lucky Larry got them for cheap.  Trump might know a little.


_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FrontierJustice
T-Bone
avatar

Posts : 1814
Join date : 2012-12-17

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Sat Mar 19, 2016 5:41 am

wag wrote:
I think this is just a litmus test, for jews to see who they are up against.  Here's a guy that provided solid cover for the OKC bombing op, which many in power probably understand better than we do.  Trump must also know, must also know about 9-11.  Jews are baiting with this move.  They want to know who would question their guy on how OKC was managed, which would also indicate a certain boldness to question 9-11.

Interesting theory. Seems like no one in Washington has the stones to touch 9/11 -- I'd imagine the concept of blowing the lid on that (or OKC for that matter), insiders would try to stay as far away from it as possible (practically a death sentence). Also, things are so bad in D.C., is it really out of the question that jews would find some 'bipartisan' way to usher in yet another snake to tip the scales further? Yeah, the republican senate said they'll stonewall any nominee til after the presidential election, but it's already looking like a weak claim, as if the fix is in. Then again, may be like you said - no one wants to go near the 'bait'.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Vidarr
Filet Mignon
avatar

Posts : 2169
Join date : 2013-01-23
Location : Iran

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:19 am

did someone notice that the reason for this nomination was because the only catholic supreme court judge Scalia was found dead with a pillow over his head ?

_________________
-"Vidarr was easily the biggest a-hole posting here.".... "by far".
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Jacob Gold
Cervelle de Veau
avatar

Posts : 5006
Join date : 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:20 pm

The Judicial-Inc website proved OKC was SPLC. Odd that david duke never mentioned any of this.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FrontierJustice
T-Bone
avatar

Posts : 1814
Join date : 2012-12-17

PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   Sat Mar 26, 2016 5:17 pm

Jacob Gold wrote:
The Judicial-Inc website proved OKC was SPLC. Odd that david duke never mentioned any of this.

The OKC material on Judicial-Inc was blockbuster, opened my eyes

http://mail.blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/Oklahoma_City_Bomb.htm

http://mail.blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/Oklahma_City_Bomb_Supplement.htm


Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?   

Back to top Go down
 
Obama nominates Merrick Garland for Supreme Court - Analysis?
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» McCanns take Amaral book fight to the Supreme Court
» McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 all 75 pages translated by Ann Guedes
» Russia's Supreme Court explained the classification of military losses
» Julian Assange loses appeal in supreme court
» 31/01/17 Supreme Court

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Laconics Round Table :: Laconics Round Table-
Jump to: