Laconics Round Table

Laconics Round Table
 
HomeFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 The Stranger (1946 film)

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2  Next
AuthorMessage
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:44 am

This is the first Hollywood movie that had footage of the camps and gas chambers(57 min mark). It seems the Jews were given hot showers first so the gas could be absorbed through the skin.



The Stranger (1946) - Full Movie here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu8-V9JRX_g



The Stranger (1946 film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stranger_%281946_film%29



The Stranger (1946) is an American film noir directed by Orson Welles and starring Welles, Edward G. Robinson, and Loretta Young. The film was based on an Oscar-nominated screenplay written by Victor Trivas. Sam Spiegel was the film's producer, and the film's musical score is by Bronisław Kaper. It is believed that this is the first film released after World War II that showed footage of concentration camps.

Directed by Orson Welles
Produced by Sam Spiegel (as S. P. Eagle)
Written by Anthony Veiller
Victor Trivas
Decla Dunning
Uncredited:
John Huston
Orson Welles
Starring Orson Welles
Loretta Young
Edward G. Robinson
Cinematography Russell Metty
Studio International Pictures
Distributed by RKO Radio Pictures
Release date(s) May 25, 1946
Running time 95 min.
Country United States
Language English


Plot

In 1946, Mr. Wilson (Edward G. Robinson) of the United Nations War Crimes Commission is hunting for Nazi fugitive Franz Kindler (Orson Welles), a war criminal who has erased all evidence which might identify him. He has assumed a new identity, Charles Rankin, and has become a prep school teacher in a small town in the United States. He has married Mary Longstreet (Loretta Young), daughter of Supreme Court Justice Adam Longstreet (Philip Merivale).

Wilson releases Kindler's former associate Meinike (Konstantin Shayne), hoping the man will lead him to Kindler. Wilson follows Meinike to the town of Harper, Connecticut, but loses him before he meets with Kindler. When Kindler/Rankin and Meinike do meet, Meinike, who is repentant, begs Kindler to confess his crimes. Instead, Kindler strangles Meinike, who might expose him.

Eventually, Wilson deduces that Rankin is Kindler, but not having witnessed the meeting with Meinike, he has no proof. Only Mrs. Rankin knows that Meinike came to meet her husband. To get her to admit this, Wilson must convince her that her husband is a criminal - before Rankin decides to eliminate the threat to him by killing her.

Rankin's pose begins to unravel when Red, the family dog, discovers Meinike's body. To protect his secret, Rankin poisons Red.

Meanwhile, Mrs. Rankin begins to suspect her husband, but is too blinded by love to accept the facts. She is torn between her desire to learn the truth about him, and the idea of helping him create his new life. Mr. Wilson shows her graphic footage of Nazi concentration camps, and explains how Kindler/Rankin developed the idea of genocide. But not until Mary discovers Rankin's plot to kill her does she finally break down. In a tense moment, she dares Rankin to kill her. Rankin tries to, but is prevented by Wilson and Mary's brother Noah. Pursued by them, he flees into a church belfry, and falls to his death.

Cast

Orson Welles as Franz Kindler / Professor Charles Rankin
Edward G. Robinson as Mr. Wilson
Loretta Young as Mary Longstreet Rankin
Philip Merivale as Judge Adam Longstreet (Mary's father)
Richard Long as Noah Longstreet (Mary’s brother)
Konstantin Shayne as Konrad Meinike
Byron Keith as Dr. Jeffrey Lawrence
Billy House as Mr. Potter
Martha Wentworth as Sara
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 12:18 pm

Hitler followed Geneva conventions (despite Allies not complying), and did not use gas. I guess jews didn't like this fact, and thus began to fabricate all their half-baked explanations for jews dying in camps from typhus, due to the allied bombing campaigns that destroyed the German distribution systems. As for killing jews with gas, defies logic. Machine gunning them into pits, like the Red Army did to the Polish officers at Katyn, would have been the most logical means. Death by poison gas would have created huge hazmat waste disposal problems, and that explanation is clearly hollywood fiction.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 12:20 pm

Watch the 30 min. mark where Welles describes Germans.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:52 pm

laconas wrote:
Watch the 30 min. mark where Welles describes Germans.

Pretty cheesy stuff. I'm just glad we don't hear too much of those blue blood accents anymore, beyond Madonna.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:00 pm

Quote :
Woman: I've never even known a Nazi!
Man: Well you might have, they look like other people, and they act like other people, ...when it is to their benefit.

Spun a complete 180. Well, there's something to be learned about the jews by what they say about Nazis. Imagine educating somebody about jews. It might start just like that.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:18 pm

wag wrote:
Quote :
Woman: I've never even known a Nazi!
Man: Well you might have, they look like other people, and they act like other people, ...when it is to their benefit.

Spun a complete 180. Well, there's something to be learned about the jews by what they say about Nazis. Imagine educating somebody about jews. It might start just like that.

They seem to do quite often. I guess the most popular one was about the Nazi's big lie technique.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:21 pm

wag wrote:
laconas wrote:
Watch the 30 min. mark where Welles describes Germans.

Pretty cheesy stuff. I'm just glad we don't hear too much of those blue blood accents anymore, beyond Madonna.

Spoiler alert!

Later in the movie, Edward G. Robinson wakes up in the middle of the night and says to himself, yes, only a Nazi would say Marx was a Jew and not a German.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:43 pm

laconas wrote:


Later in the movie, Edward G. Robinson wakes up in the middle of the night and says to himself, yes, only a Nazi would say Marx was a Jew and not a German.

Marx is interesting, true. You could argue that he was anti-semitic, in that he was against the banking cabal and supported power of the people. Jews didn't benefit from Marx until Lenin. Of course, Lenin's target was the age-old jew target, Russia. There weren't any New York jews advocating Marxism for Germany at that time, as Jews already controlled Germany (and continued until Hitler). If you were to assume that the bourgeoisie in Berlin at that time were rich Jews, it wouldn't be until Hitler that Marxist ideas are employed. Marx gets darked severely as a result of what the jews did in 1917. Otherwise, as with Hitler's National Socialism, it has a lot of validity today. Jews have found means to silence the two great political philosophies.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:46 pm

wag wrote:
laconas wrote:


Later in the movie, Edward G. Robinson wakes up in the middle of the night and says to himself, yes, only a Nazi would say Marx was a Jew and not a German.

Marx is interesting, true. You could argue that he was anti-semitic, in that he was against the banking cabal and supported power of the people. Jews didn't benefit from Marx until Lenin. Of course, Lenin's target was the age-old jew target, Russia. There weren't any New York jews advocating Marxism for Germany at that time, as Jews already controlled Germany (and continued until Hitler). If you were to assume that the bourgeoisie in Berlin at that time were rich Jews, it wouldn't be until Hitler that Marxist ideas are employed. Marx gets darked severely as a result of what the jews did in 1917. Otherwise, as with Hitler's National Socialism, it has a lot of validity today. Jews have found means to silence the two great political philosophies.

Marx was a Rothschild tool. Years ago I looked up his one or two paragraphs he wrote regarding usury and the banking system--he never mentions Rothschild. His target was those evil land owners and the up coming factory owners of the time, 160 years ago. Clever Jew, no?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:00 pm

laconas wrote:

Marx was a Rothschild tool. Years ago I looked up his one or two paragraphs he wrote regarding usury and the banking system--he never mentions Rothschild. His target was those evil land owners and the up coming factory owners of the time, 160 years ago. Clever Jew, no?

Assuming this is correct, Marx should be revisited when jews emerge to control American means of production - real estate and jobs/human capital (nee cattle).

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:37 pm

wag wrote:
laconas wrote:

Marx was a Rothschild tool. Years ago I looked up his one or two paragraphs he wrote regarding usury and the banking system--he never mentions Rothschild. His target was those evil land owners and the up coming factory owners of the time, 160 years ago. Clever Jew, no?

Assuming this is correct, Marx should be revisited when jews emerge to control American means of production - real estate and jobs/human capital (nee cattle).

I kinda suspect between the Federal Reserve, interest, and taxes they already do.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
OLW
Admin


Posts: 393
Join date: 2012-11-30

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:26 am

laconas wrote:
wag wrote:

Assuming this is correct, Marx should be revisited when jews emerge to control American means of production - real estate and jobs/human capital (nee cattle).

I kinda suspect between the Federal Reserve, interest, and taxes they already do.

Is it possible that the proletariat could be led by a non-jew? I guess revolution doesn't work that well without the jewish element (nee murderous thugs) and a bourgeoisie well-protected by multiple levels and angles of force. But that said, the application of Marx to modern America fails in that the means of production currently resides outside US borders. The modern US proletariat, if such exists, is mostly an idle consumer, producing only waste streams. Marx apparently didn't think it through all the way to today's absurdities, where nations mean nothing, global liquidity everything. That brings us to Rand and the super-jews.

_________________
laconics.forumotion.com
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://laconics.forumotion.com
laconas
Filet Mignon


Posts: 2565
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:02 pm

OLW wrote:
laconas wrote:
wag wrote:

Assuming this is correct, Marx should be revisited when jews emerge to control American means of production - real estate and jobs/human capital (nee cattle).

I kinda suspect between the Federal Reserve, interest, and taxes they already do.

Is it possible that the proletariat could be led by a non-jew? I guess revolution doesn't work that well without the jewish element (nee murderous thugs) and a bourgeoisie well-protected by multiple levels and angles of force. But that said, the application of Marx to modern America fails in that the means of production currently resides outside US borders. The modern US proletariat, if such exists, is mostly an idle consumer, producing only waste streams. Marx apparently didn't think it through all the way to today's absurdities, where nations mean nothing, global liquidity everything. That brings us to Rand and the super-jews.

The concept of the prot being led wouldn't exist without Marx. Marx was a Rothschild agent hired to write a treatise in 1850 to "empower" factory workers of the time against their bosses. It should be noted that even in the early 1830's labor movements in Britain already existed-- FWIW, it wasn't an original idea on Marx's part.

The up and coming factory owners were a force to be reckoned with in the 19th Century. If the money lenders couldn't control them, they would eventually have put the money lenders out of business. To make a long story short, armed with Marxist philosophy to control the people, the creation of private central banks by the money lenders to control the the money supply, and control of the military to crush any nation that wouldn't accept a brand J central bank--the control toady is complete.

Factory owners today are at the mercy of the bankers, govt. tariffs and taxes. And these institutions are controlled by you know you.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
wag
Filet Mignon


Posts: 5018
Join date: 2012-12-04

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:40 pm

laconas wrote:
The up and coming factory owners were a force to be reckoned with in the 19th Century. If the money lenders couldn't control them, they would eventually have put the money lenders out of business. To make a long story short, armed with Marxist philosophy to control the people, the creation of private central banks by the money lenders to control the the money supply, and control of the military to crush any nation that wouldn't accept a brand J central bank--the control toady is complete.

Factory owners today are at the mercy of the bankers, govt. tariffs and taxes. And these institutions are controlled by you know you.

I see. It was a narrowly targeted attack on superior vision, planning, engineering and managing, which would naturally be the product of a formidable non-jew mind. Divide and conquer at the micro level!

But here, now, you take the class distinctions of Marxism, forget all the industrial revolution aspects. Is there potential for great surplus, yes. Who are the national workers, who are the national owners? You got the hammer, I got the sickle. Here come the gun laws.

_________________
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FrontierJustice
Sirloin


Posts: 578
Join date: 2012-12-18

PostSubject: Re: The Stranger (1946 film)   Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:14 pm

wag wrote:
Quote :
Woman: I've never even known a Nazi!
Man: Well you might have, they look like other people, and they act like other people, ...when it is to their benefit.
Spun a complete 180. Well, there's something to be learned about the jews by what they say about Nazis. Imagine educating somebody about jews. It might start just like that.

It pretty much does in this German classic



The Stranger plays as direct counter-propaganda to Der Ewige Jude, like jews just took the same material and reversed it.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
 

The Stranger (1946 film)

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 2Go to page : 1, 2  Next

 Similar topics

-
» Film star Tony Curtis dies at 85
» DR NATHAN FRANCIS MOSSELL 1856-1946
» Great Film Clips - Dance Scenes.........
» Spain's traffic authority fines film company over Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts poster
» Debut film based on Madeleine McCann and Josef Fritzl cases

Permissions in this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
Laconics Round Table :: -
Post new topic   Reply to topic